On Friday, CNN analyst Phil Mudd exploded during a segment after a conservative commentator expressed support for the Trump administration’s decision to revoke security clearances of former Obama officials who no longer work in the government and who have been accused of leaking information. Mudd got so angry he tried to kick Dennard off somebody else’s show.
“A lot of these people that have these security clearances — and this is the secret in the swampy Washington, D.C. — they have them and they keep them because it’s profitable for them after they leave government,” Paris Dennard said. “Because if you have a security clearance, especially a high-level security clearance, your contracts and consulting gigs pay you a lot more money because of the access that you have.”
“Profitable, Paris?” Mudd began.
CNN analyst Philip Mudd explodes on Paris Dennard, cusses and screams at him: "get out!" pic.twitter.com/KIQVoD7lTv
— Ryan Saavedra 🇺🇸 (@RealSaavedra) August 18, 2018
“When I’m required to sit on an advisory board, let me ask you one question, how much do you think I’m paid to do that at the request of U.S. government?” Mudd screamed. “Give me one answer, and you’ve got ten seconds. I have no contracts with the U.S. government. They pay me zero.”
Dennard then asked Mudd: “How much are you paid for your contracting gig?”
“I have no contracts with the U.S. government that pay money,” Mudd exploded. “Zero.”
After continuing to go back and forth, Mudd lost it, screaming “get out!” at Dennard.
“Twenty-five years in the service and this is the sh*t I get!” Mudd exclaimed.
"Zero. I get zero dollars from consulting companies that deal with U.S. government. Are we clear?" Counterterrorism analyst Phil Mudd takes exception to commentator Paris Dennard's suggestion that he benefits financially from his security clearance https://t.co/kPjQ9VFu4t pic.twitter.com/rTdipyFavC
— Anderson Cooper 360° (@AC360) August 18, 2018
“Get out!” Mudd repeated.
Dennard is 100% right. All the yelling, posturing and psychopathic outbursts on the part of the self righteous Mudd doesn’t change that.
When a conservative verbally confronts a liberal on an issue like this and their point goes against the liberal’s rhetoric, the liberal get very angry and very irate. Remember Whoopi’s tirade. The left does not like being challenged and becomes vitolic when questioned. Kimmel threatened Kilmeade with physical violence when Brian questioned Kimmel about his motives.
They can’t handle the truth. It doesn’t take much to set them off.
What do you think? Scroll down to leave a comment below!
Facebook has greatly reduced the distribution of our stories in our readers’ newsfeeds and is instead promoting mainstream media sources. When you share with your friends, however, you greatly help distribute our content. Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with your friends and family. Thank you
H/T The Daily Wire
Natalie D. is an American conservative writer who writes for Supreme Insider, Right Journalism, and Conservative US! Natalie has described herself as a polemicist who likes to “stir up the pot,” and does not “pretend to be impartial or balanced, as broadcasters do,” drawing criticism from the left, and sometimes from the right. As a passionate journalist, she works relentlessly to uncover the corruption happening in Washington .She is a “constitutional conservative”.