Huma Abedin Reportedly Gave False Statements to The FBI In 2017 Interview

Anyone who knows even a little bit about Government IT and Classified Info Security knows that Abedin, Clinton and several more of that crowd have broken the law and should have been prosecuted. It is an outrage that our media and DOJ protects them, but sends others, who do far less, to jail.

Via Gateway Pundit: “The FBI previously declassified Huma’s 302 summary from her 2016 interview with Peter Strzok and David Laufman.

Hillary’s ride-or-die aides, Huma Abedin and Cheryl Mills both lied to Strzok and Laufman.

Abedin lied to Strzok in her 2016 interview when said she had no knowledge of Hillary Clinton’s private server until after leaving the State Department in early 2013.

“Abedin did not know that Clinton had a private server until about a year and a half ago when it became public knowledge,” according to Strzok’s 302 summary interview with Huma.”

Now, the conservative author and political commentator Paul E. Sperry tweeted that Huma Abedin reportedly also lied FBI investigators in her late 2017 interview.

Sperry wrote: “The FBI declassified Huma’s 302 from 2016. Congress must demand similar declassification of her 302 from 2017. I’m told it makes clear she gave false statements to investigators. Yet in a glaring double standard, Huma was never charged or prosecuted for 1001 — unlike Trump aides.”

Didn’t the FBI give Humus immunity before they even interviewed her? The FBI was never interested in the truth.

In a following tweet, Sperry wrote: “BREAKING: Strzok & his MYE team failed to interview Huma Abedin about why she had classified information on an unclassified laptop she shared with her non-cleared (criminal) husband until 2 months AFTER the election & AFTER the FBI had already cleared Hillary & Huma a second time.”

We knew that she lied about the server. The FBI did everything possible to protect Hillary and her aides from prosecution despite clear and obvious crimes. This is beyond disgusting and serves to prove that the laws do not apply to democrats.

This whole thing is an absolute disgrace and a stain on the FBI. The saving grace is that Hillary Clinton lost big.

What do you think? Scroll down to leave a comment below!

Facebook has greatly reduced the distribution of our stories in our readers’ newsfeeds and is instead promoting mainstream media sources. When you share with your friends, however, you greatly help distribute our content. Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with your friends and family. Thank you

Natalie D.

Natalie D. is an American conservative writer who writes for  Supreme Insider,  Right Journalism, and Conservative US! Natalie has described herself as a polemicist who likes to "stir up the pot," and does not "pretend to be impartial or balanced, as broadcasters do," drawing criticism from the left, and sometimes from the right. As a passionate journalist, she works relentlessly to uncover the corruption happening in Washington .She is a "constitutional conservative".