On Sunday, South Carolina GOP Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) said he had subpoenaed documents from the FBI on the Clinton email investigation because he wanted to “prove that the FBI investigation of the Clinton email scandal was a sham.”
On Fox News Channel’s “Sunday Morning Futures,” Graham said: “I want more information. I want to be able to prove that the FBI investigation of the Clinton email scandal was a sham. That the lead investigator, the lead FBI agent, hated Trump, supportive of Clinton.”
He continued: “They whitewashed the email scandal. If you had done what she had done you’d probably be in jail right now, and to hold the FBI accountable for not doing their job correctly. Comey, I think the fix was in.”
Everyone knows it was a sham. One of the FBI’s finest who worked on the Russian election-meddling investigation was a huge Hillary Clinton supporter who also worked on the botched Clinton email investigation. Peter Strzok, one of the lead investigators into Hillary Clinton’s mishandling of classified information on her private server, hated Trump.
But, the FBI has been covering up their crimes for decades. If he wants to prove he can not simply asking the FBI to voluntarily turn over proof of their own crimes is like asking a drug cartel to voluntarily turn over his drugs so that they can then be put in jail. Don’t ask, go in and take.
There are so many crimes that Hillary has committed. The real question is will Clinton’s be ever held accountable for anything?
What do you think about this? Is Graham sincere about Hillary/FBI’s investigation?
Scroll down to leave a comment below!
Natalie D. is an American conservative writer who writes for Supreme Insider, Right Journalism, and Conservative US! Natalie has described herself as a polemicist who likes to “stir up the pot,” and does not “pretend to be impartial or balanced, as broadcasters do,” drawing criticism from the left, and sometimes from the right. As a passionate journalist, she works relentlessly to uncover the corruption happening in Washington .She is a “constitutional conservative”.