Meghan Markle Might Not Get Royal Title

In the eyes of many, the prospect of a normal woman marrying a prince and becoming a princess is the ultimate fairytale.

So of course, American actress Meghan Markle’s newly announced engagement to Prince Harry has been met with much excitement.

Many Americans are delighting over the fact that Markle is set to become a princess – except she’s not.

In best case scenario she’s most likely to be a duchess, much like Kate Middleton became the Duchess of Cambridge when she married Prince William.

Once Harry and Meghan tie the knot, she will take his title and name.

This means Markle will become Her Royal Highness Princess Henry of Wales, alongside any other title the Queen chooses to give her.

However it’s likely that Prince Harry will be given a dukedom, so Markle will become a duchess like Catherine.

But now even her Royal title could come in jeopardy because there are so many angry petitioners who insist that she must not get an official title when she marries Prince Harry.

Furious royalists say Markle would bring shame on the royal family as a divorcee who has been outspoken on issues like Trump and Brexit, as well as appearing on TV with little clothing on.

Markle appears to have the backing of the entire royal family and was the first unmarried partner to receive an invite to Sandringham for Christmas this year.
However, some members of the public are not so taken with her. An online petition is circulating as hundreds try to stop Markle getting a title.
The petition states: “We the undersigned believe that Meghan Markle is unsuitable to be a member of the Royal Family and to have an official position in representing this country.

“She has shown her disrespect for the Monarch and Royal Family by pulling faces and sticking her tongue out to the visitors during her first public appearance with the Queen.”

It also claims Markle “showed a lack of respect towards Harry” during a recent visit to Nottingham, but did not explain how. Markle will also not be respected since the ‘Suits’ actress has been seen scantily clad in magazines and on TV.

“No member of the Royal Family should have naked images of them freely available on the internet as she does,” the petition reads.

“Her constant sex simulation makes her a laughing stock and an embarrassment to this country.”

The petition alleges divorcee Markle was unfaithful to past partners, and issues a plea to “prevent her from having an official role or title after her marriage to Harry.”

The petition was started by a Louise Pawsey and has amassed more than 350 signatories – with a target of 500.

Prime Minister Theresa May, Her Majesty the Queen and Prince Charles will be sent the petition if reaches its target.

Harry and Meghan are expected to become the Duke and Duchess of Sussex, but the order must come from the Queen.

Her Majesty gave the Duke of Cambridge, Harry’s brother, his title on his wedding day.

Alex Hall

Alex D is a conservative journalist, who covers all issues of importance for conservatives. He writes for Supreme Insider, Red State Nation, Defiant America, Right Journalism,  Conservative US. He brings attention and insight from what happens in the White House to the streets of American towns, because it all has an impact on our future, and the country left for our children. Exposing the truth is his ultimate goal, mixed with wit where it's appropriate, and feels that journalism shouldn't be censored. Join him & let's spread the good word!

4 thoughts on “Meghan Markle Might Not Get Royal Title

  • December 29, 2017 at 11:53 am
    Permalink

    To whom it may concerns,
    Unfortunately,Prince Harry has never attained the psycho-emotional maturity that his older brother, Prince William, seems to have!
    From his chaotic teenage period in to young adult age, Prince Harry seemed to manifest “difficulty” behaving as a balanced and psychologically normal individual when compared to his older brother.
    This is a significant fact because these two brothers grew up in the same house hold and with the same sets of rules and circumstances, and yet Prince Harry has always been struggling with his identity, emotions, role as a person or as a member of royal family, and life in general.
    Looking deeply and carefully in to Prince Harry’s life, apart from the Invictus games ( some say it was his invention solely, however, this statement has been debated ) and also support for some of the charities that is obviously his responsibility since he receives tax-payers fund as income, he has contributed not much to the Britain or the royal family when compared to other further distant royals and their support and contributions to the longevity of the royal family and prosperity of Britain. It seems that there has been nothing but this air of sympathy and sorrow for Prince Harry. How he lost his mother as a young boy, but forgetting the fact that he was not the sole child of Princess Diana. Prince William went through the same ordeal.
    Then there is the Hollywood element and his fetish rather obsession with actresses. He went wild with his sex life and to some extend cross the line of decency and yet all was forgiven because he lost his mother and was traumatised as a child!!
    There have been thousands of children around the world, who went (and unfortunately, will go) through Prince Harry’s experience of sudden loss of their beloved parents and yet they did not go wild and behaved badly. Further to this, these ordinary children did not have the luxury of living in a palace with their very own psychologist at hand. Yet, they grew up just normal.
    In conclusion, the tragic loss of a parent, as a sole excuse for abnormal behaviour, is rather an absurd excuse for a man who has gotten away with quit a lot! And now he is about to get married and naturally he could not settle down with a well balanced, respected and mature individual from a balanced family. Just like everything that Prince Harry has done and will continue to do, this marriage will cause and burden awful amount of difficulties for him, the royal family, the British government and ultimately for Britain. After all, it runs in to the Windsor family, whether it was Prince Edward the VIII, Princesses Margarite, Prince Charles, Princesses Anne or Prince Andrew.
    The Duke of York’s marriage saga , in fact, bears a distinctive resemblance to that of Prince Harry’s. Prince Andrew was also rather spoilt by his mother and forgiven for his mischiefs, many times. Who could forget that how the queen and the queen mother and, in fact, the entire royal family were excited about Prince Andrew’s marriage to Sarah Ferguson? Who could forget that the queen was running behind the newlyweds as they headed out of the castle in a carriage?
    The royal family adored Ms Ferguson for the first couple of years post the wedding. However, today, they wish it never happened.

    While Ms Markle is no Ms Ferguson, she has her own issues. She grew up in a broken family from low socio-economical and educational back ground. Her father had won an Emmy award for directing the lights on a set, but so what? Mr Markle senior’s life has been anything but stable with three failed marriages, lots of children to feed, debt, bankruptcy and finally living as a recluse as a solution!!

    That is hardly a successful individual with a balanced life style or view. As for Ms Markle’s mother, she managed to raise her daughter single-handedly but with difficulty and financial problems. They had to move so often. Not having a permanent roof,by itself, is a disaster in normal upbringing of children. Ms Markle’s mother managed to earn a degree in social work later in life. But she worked as a Yoga instructor in her early days. But none of these is going to change Ms Markle’s mother, Doria, miserable past. Doria Raglan was raised in poverty yet again by a single mother who had no education. Ms Raglan suffered racism, poverty and experienced a difficult life as a child. That all has also left scar on Ms Doria Raglan and was ultimately the reason for her to pursue education and “To Be Somebody” due to the lack of self esteem that she suffered. The degree in social work is another evidence of the way Ms Raglan tried to distant her self from her miserable past . Ms Raglan needed a refuge to figure out who she was and she found that through social studies she could address that. Sadly, that was too late for Meghan. Because she raised her daughter, Meghan, before “finding herself” and her strength or rather self respect. That all was absorbed by the little child that was Meghan Markle.

    From the early age Meghan Markle realised that she did not want to live either like her mother or her father. She was thirsty for stability, recognition, wealth ( that she never had), fame and an outlet where she could pour out all her frustrations with herself as a biracial individual, her physical appearance ( she was told that she was ugly and fat), and struggle with life in general. So, she chose Hollywood. The easiest place where sex sells apart from the obvious, the red light district!

    Obviously, the red light district was not a respectable choice for Ms Markle. Hollywood was. And yes, she played by the Hollywood rules. She posed nude in front of cameras , exposed her body when necessary, and played the game, so to speak, to survive and but more importantly to get what she was after: Stability.
    Money brought fame and with that there came stability. It also gave her an apartment that was something beyond her wildest dreams, as a child. Fancy clothing and jewellery, and all those goodies when an individual prepared to bend to a set of rules at any cost, like many actresses in Hollywood.
    But then there was marriage and her first marriage did not work. Then with fame came connections. Some very promising, indeed. Through them, there was a meeting with a melancholic, sad, confused and rather immature Prince from another land. So why not?
    That was the ultimate for Ms Markle and as she uttered with such excitement in her interview with Vogue. She uttered: “I am the luckiest girl in the world”!
    Ms Markle can and will control Prince Harry, gradually and because of her psychological issues will try to manipulate the monarchy to get what she wants, recognition and “at any cost”!
    That is Meghan’s way. She has to “be tough”, or to me rather manipulative and aggressive based on her life so far, to get what she wants. That is what her grandmother, Doria Raglan’s mother taught her. Ms Markle almost shouted the above sentence in to the microphone on the podium at a venue that beared resemblance to that of the UN or some where affiliated to the UN.
    As far as showing her tongue “like a dog” to the British, is just a small gesture or rather a signal of what is a head for the monarchy, the government and Britain.
    Unfortunately, with the house of Windsor, this is rather a recurrent phenomenon or to put it blatantly: “A curse”, 1936- Present- in to the future!

    My apology for rather lengthy comment!

    Thank you for your time spent reading the above note!

    Sincerely,
    Petra Kashi, M.Sc., PhD

    Reply
    • December 29, 2017 at 7:33 pm
      Permalink

      Wonderful article! I wish I could sign the letter!

      Reply
  • December 29, 2017 at 11:55 am
    Permalink

    To whom it may concerns,
    Unfortunately,Prince Harry has never attained the psycho-emotional maturity that his older brother, Prince William, seems to have!
    From his chaotic teenage period in to young adult age, Prince Harry seemed to manifest “difficulty” behaving as a balanced and psychologically normal individual when compared to his older brother.
    This is a significant fact because these two brothers grew up in the same house hold and with the same sets of rules and circumstances, and yet Prince Harry has always been struggling with his identity, emotions, role as a person or as a member of royal family, and life in general.
    Looking deeply and carefully in to Prince Harry’s life, apart from the Invictus games ( some say it was his invention solely, however, this statement has been debated ) and also support for some of the charities that is obviously his responsibility since he receives tax-payers fund as income, he has contributed not much to the Britain or the royal family when compared to other further distant royals and their support and contributions to the longevity of the royal family and prosperity of Britain. It seems that there has been nothing but this air of sympathy and sorrow for Prince Harry. How he lost his mother as a young boy, but forgetting the fact that he was not the sole child of Princess Diana. Prince William went through the same ordeal.
    Then there is the Hollywood element and his fetish rather obsession with actresses. He went wild with his sex life and to some extend cross the line of decency and yet all was forgiven because he lost his mother and was traumatised as a child!!
    There have been thousands of children around the world, who went (and unfortunately, will go) through Prince Harry’s experience of sudden loss of their beloved parents and yet they did not go wild and behaved badly. Further to this, these ordinary children did not have the luxury of living in a palace with their very own psychologist at hand. Yet, they grew up just normal.
    In conclusion, the tragic loss of a parent, as a sole excuse for abnormal behaviour, is rather an absurd excuse for a man who has gotten away with quit a lot! And now he is about to get married and naturally he could not settle down with a well balanced, respected and mature individual from a balanced family. Just like everything that Prince Harry has done and will continue to do, this marriage will cause and burden awful amount of difficulties for him, the royal family, the British government and ultimately for Britain. After all, it runs in to the Windsor family, whether it was Prince Edward the VIII, Princesses Margarite, Prince Charles, Princesses Anne or Prince Andrew.
    The Duke of York’s marriage saga , in fact, bears a distinctive resemblance to that of Prince Harry’s. Prince Andrew was also rather spoilt by his mother and forgiven for his mischiefs, many times. Who could forget that how the queen and the queen mother and, in fact, the entire royal family were excited about Prince Andrew’s marriage to Sarah Ferguson? Who could forget that the queen was running behind the newlyweds as they headed out of the castle in a carriage?
    The royal family adored Ms Ferguson for the first couple of years post the wedding. However, today, they wish it never happened.
    While Ms Markle is no Ms Ferguson, she has her own issues. She grew up in a broken family from low socio-economical and educational back ground. Her father had won an Emmy award for directing the lights on a set, but so what? Mr Markle senior’s life has been anything but stable with three failed marriages, lots of children to feed, debt, bankruptcy and finally living as a recluse as a solution!!
    That is hardly a successful individual with a balanced life style or view. As for Ms Markle’s mother, she managed to raise her daughter single-handedly but with difficulty and financial problems. They had to move so often. Not having a permanent roof,by itself, is a disaster in normal upbringing of children. Ms Markle’s mother managed to earn a degree in social work later in life. But she worked as a Yoga instructor in her early days. But none of these is going to change Ms Markle’s mother, Doria, miserable past. Doria Raglan was raised in poverty yet again by a single mother who had no education. Ms Raglan suffered racism, poverty and experienced a difficult life as a child. That all has also left scar on Ms Doria Raglan and was ultimately the reason for her to pursue education and “To Be Somebody” due to the lack of self esteem that she suffered. The degree in social work is another evidence of the way Ms Raglan tried to distant her self from her miserable past . Ms Raglan needed a refuge to figure out who she was and she found that through social studies she could address that. Sadly, that was too late for Meghan. Because she raised her daughter, Meghan, before “finding herself” and her strength or rather self respect. That all was absorbed by the little child that was Meghan Markle.
    From the early age Meghan Markle realised that she did not want to live either like her mother or her father. She was thirsty for stability, recognition, wealth ( that she never had), fame and an outlet where she could pour out all her frustrations with herself as a biracial individual, her physical appearance ( she was told that she was ugly and fat), and struggle with life in general. So, she chose Hollywood. The easiest place where sex sells apart from the obvious, the red light district!
    Obviously, the red light district was not a respectable choice for Ms Markle. Hollywood was. And yes, she played by the Hollywood rules. She posed nude in front of cameras , exposed her body when necessary, and played the game, so to speak, to survive and but more importantly to get what she was after: Stability.
    Money brought fame and with that there came stability. It also gave her an apartment that was something beyond her wildest dreams, as a child. Fancy clothing and jewellery, and all those goodies when an individual prepared to bend to a set of rules at any cost, like many actresses in Hollywood.
    But then there was marriage and her first marriage did not work. Then with fame came connections. Some very promising, indeed. Through them, there was a meeting with a melancholic, sad, confused and rather immature Prince from another land. So why not?
    That was the ultimate for Ms Markle and as she uttered with such excitement in her interview with Vogue. She uttered: “I am the luckiest girl in the world”!
    Ms Markle can and will control Prince Harry, gradually and because of her psychological issues will try to manipulate the monarchy to get what she wants, recognition and “at any cost”!
    That is Meghan’s way. She has to “be tough”, or to me rather manipulative and aggressive based on her life so far, to get what she wants. That is what her grandmother, Doria Raglan’s mother taught her. Ms Markle almost shouted the above sentence in to the microphone on the podium at a venue that beared resemblance to that of the UN or some where affiliated to the UN.
    As far as showing her tongue “like a dog” to the British, is just a small gesture or rather a signal of what is a head for the monarchy, the government and Britain.
    Unfortunately, with the house of Windsor, this is rather a recurrent phenomenon or to put it blatantly: “A curse”, 1936- Present- in to the future!
    My apology for rather lengthy comment!
    Thank you for your time spent reading the above note!
    Sincerely,
    Petra Kashi, M.Sc., PhD

    Reply
  • December 29, 2017 at 7:35 pm
    Permalink

    Wonderful article. Wish I could sign letter!

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *