The Muslims are trying to undermine western culture at every turn. They will not assimilate and expect the host country to bend to their customs. They think they are better than us and that special treatment is required for them? But they must finally learn that the West won’t cave to their demands or tolerate their expectations of special treatment any longer.
After all, if we were in their country it would be a different story.
And now, a Victorian judge named Christopher Beale has banned a woman whose husband is facing terrorism charges from wearing a niqab in court, saying it posed a potential security risk.
Via The Guardian: “The woman applied through her husband’s lawyers to wear the face veil, which she said was “a fundamental way in which she observes her faith”, while sitting in the public gallery to support him through the six-week trial.
She said she had been permitted to wear the niqab during a committal hearing in the magistrate’s court and was willing to show her face to security guards manning the metal detector and weapons check at the court entrance to verify her identity.
But the supreme court judge Christopher Beale said the risk of a mistrial or other incident caused by “misbehaving” in the public gallery would be heightened if a person could not be instantly identified because their face was covered, and ruled that the risk outweighed the infringement upon the woman’s right to freedom of religious expression.
“Deterrence, identification, and proof are all served by a requirement that spectators in the public gallery have their faces uncovered,” he said in a decision handed down on Monday.”
The MUSLIMS and refugees are not to make rules in other countries and less in America. This sort of behavior from these people has been happening for far too long here in this country. They immigrate to our country for a better life and when we let them in, then they spit in our faces, by not accepting our rule of law, our traditions.
Funny thing is, this woman wants to avail the privilege of using the courts but refuses to adhere to the customs of the court? Maybe she should just go home and be comfortable because standing for a judge has nothing to do with religion.
This woman needs to conform to the rules of the country she is living in, and there should be no exceptions.
What do you think?
Facebook has greatly reduced the distribution of our stories in our readers’ newsfeeds and is instead promoting mainstream media sources. When you share with your friends, however, you greatly help distribute our content. Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with your friends and family. Thank you.
Natalie D. is an American conservative writer who writes for Supreme Insider, Right Journalism, and Conservative US! Natalie has described herself as a polemicist who likes to “stir up the pot,” and does not “pretend to be impartial or balanced, as broadcasters do,” drawing criticism from the left, and sometimes from the right. As a passionate journalist, she works relentlessly to uncover the corruption happening in Washington .She is a “constitutional conservative”.