Problem is, the Party-of-Hate/Democrats may not care about consequences. They just hate President Trump and want to ‘Get Trump’ by any means possible. However, this entire ‘remove Trump’ thing has no foundation in law… it’s just angry bribe-takers against our best President of my lifetime! It is obvious that Americans aren’t going to stand for it!
So, every time Democrats screech “impeach!” I think to myself “go ahead, let’s see how it goes for you after you do that.”
Luckily, on Sunday morning, Scott Adams the creator of the Dilbert comic strip and the author of several nonfiction works of satire, commentary, and business said that if prosecutors pursue President Donald Trump, he will make sure that Hillary Clinton and her allies go to jail.
Via Breitbart: Adams said that his theory explained why Trump had retained Jeff Sessions as Attorney General, even while attacking him for failing to pursue charges against Hillary Clinton, as well as members of the “deep state” who had conspired to spy on the Trump campaign.
The goal, he said, was to make sure prosecutors understood there was a “red line” they could not cross — because doing so would trigger Sessions’ replacement with a prosecutor who would take down Trump’s enemies:
Let me ask you this — and I’ve not seen any reporting on this: what would happen if they actually got the president on something serious? Well, between the time the president knew he was going down — and this is hypothetical, let’s imagine that they found something in his business or something that was problematic — he would have a number of months of being in power before he was technically out of office. What would he do? Well, I think he would employ “mutually assured destruction” — not of the world, but of Hillary Clinton. It seems to me he’s setting up the situation to make it clear that if he goes down, he’s going to have plenty of time to take Hillary down. And here’s how he’d do it. Fire Jeff Sessions — and there’s tons of political blowback, but who cares? Because this would be the point where it doesn’t matter anymore. He has nothing to lose. He’s going to fire Jeff Sessions, he’s going to put somebody in — if he can get them approved — who will do nothing but take Hillary down. So it seems to me by threatening Jeff Sessions but not moving on it, he’s sending the clearest message possible that if the deep state takes him out, he’s going to take Hillary out.
Adams later specified that the “red line” for Special Counsel Robert Mueller was an investigation into the broader finances of the Trump Organization, which had nothing to do with the 2016 presidential election or allegations of Russian “collusion.”
He noted that even though Trump Organization chief financial officer Allen Weisselberg had been granted immunity in exchange for providing information to prosecutors, that information was limited to the investigation into Trump’s former lawyer, Michael Cohen. If prosecutors pushed Weisselberg for more information, Adams speculated, that would trigger “mutually assured destruction” — and prosecutors knew it.
If Trump could not find a nominee who could pass Senate confirmation, Adams said, he could keep firing underlings — including Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein — until he found someone who would target Hillary Clinton and her associates.
He added that Trump’s gambit would work even if he was removed from office before he could imprison Hillary Clinton. His successor would do so — either immediately, or the next time a Republican was elected. The motive for revenge among Trump supporters would be too strong to ignore, Adams argued.”
Scott Adams may have it right. But, as much as I would love to see Hillary go to prison, I don’t think the trade would be worth it. We need Trump!
Hillary Clinton should probably be in jail anyway because she did the Uranium One deal that only benefited cronyism and herself and was not in the best interest of the people. Wasn’t this deal basically selling out the resources of one country for the personal benefit so that another country could claim them?
So, how about an actual investigation into Hillary and charges of obstruction on Strzok and the others who pretended to investigate the last time? That should include Comey and Rosenstein.
What do you think?
Facebook has greatly reduced the distribution of our stories in our readers’ newsfeeds and is instead promoting mainstream media sources. When you share with your friends, however, you greatly help distribute our content. Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with your friends and family. Thank you
Natalie D. is an American conservative writer who writes for Supreme Insider, Right Journalism, and Conservative US! Natalie has described herself as a polemicist who likes to “stir up the pot,” and does not “pretend to be impartial or balanced, as broadcasters do,” drawing criticism from the left, and sometimes from the right. As a passionate journalist, she works relentlessly to uncover the corruption happening in Washington .She is a “constitutional conservative”.